Before you begin

No previous experience required unless you choose a coding exercise. Use an account you are allowed to access; features vary by product and region.

What you will learn

  • Organize a notebook around a question.
  • Distinguish a source from an AI-generated explanation.
  • Use practice questions for active recall.
  • Check sharing settings before sharing sources.

First, a naming note

You may know this tool as NotebookLM. During this review, Google’s NotebookLM help address redirected to documentation titled Gemini Notebook. We retain NotebookLM in this guide so it is easy to find, while noting the name used by the current help page. Follow the labels shown in your account rather than assuming every interface has changed together.

Google describes a notebook as a collection of sources for a project. Its help page includes source-based chat and study outputs such as reports, flashcards, quizzes and overviews. It also states that notebooks are independent. This is a research and study product, not simply an image-generation model.

Start with a question and two reliable sources

Choose a narrow question, such as how a microcontroller differs from a single-board computer. Add two sources you are permitted to upload. Record who wrote them, their dates and which hardware versions they describe. A notebook containing mixed or outdated sources can produce a well-written but confusing answer.

Ask which source supports each important claim. Open the cited passage and check its context. A citation is a path to evidence, not a guarantee that the generated statement faithfully represents the evidence. If the sources disagree, ask for a comparison rather than a blended answer.

Turn reading into retrieval practice

Request five questions covering the main distinctions. Answer them without looking at the notebook. Then check your answers against the original passages and record the reason for each mistake: missing knowledge, confused terms or an ambiguous question.

A summary can help orient you, but rereading it is not the same as recalling the concept independently. Finish by explaining the idea in your own words and creating a new example. Return later to the questions you missed; adjust the review interval to your learning rather than treating one schedule as universal.

Keep your source collection private when needed

Before sharing a notebook, inspect what the recipient can access. Google’s help warns that hiding material in a chat-focused view does not necessarily revoke access to underlying sources. A clean-looking share view is not a privacy boundary.

Do not upload classmates’ personal information, confidential documents or material you lack permission to use. Exporting a study guide also creates another copy that may have different sharing settings. Review the destination before distributing it.

Try this prompt

This is a suggested exercise, not a tested guarantee of any model’s output.

Using only the selected sources, explain the difference between a microcontroller and a single-board computer. Cite the supporting passages and separate any disagreement between sources. Create five practice questions with answers separately. Say when a source does not support a claim.

Mini project & challenge

  1. Create a notebook with two permitted sources on one question.
  2. Verify three citations by reading their original passages.
  3. Challenge: answer the practice questions tomorrow without opening the summary first.

Common mistakes

  • Assuming a citation makes a statement automatically correct.
  • Mixing board generations without noting their dates.
  • Only rereading summaries instead of recalling ideas.
  • Sharing a notebook without checking access to its sources.

Check your understanding

  1. Is NotebookLM primarily an image-generation model?
  2. What should you do with a citation?
  3. What is active recall?
  4. Does hiding source panels necessarily revoke source access?
  5. How should conflicting sources be handled?
  6. Why record a source’s date and hardware version?
  7. Can a fluent summary misrepresent its source?
  8. What should follow a wrong practice answer?
  9. Why review an exported guide’s sharing settings?
  10. What naming change did this review observe?
Show answers
  1. No; this guide covers a source-based research and study product.
  2. Open it and check that its passage supports the claim.
  3. Retrieving an answer from memory before checking it.
  4. No; check the actual sharing permissions.
  5. Identify and compare the disagreement rather than silently merging them.
  6. Older or different versions can describe incompatible details.
  7. Yes; check important claims against the original passage.
  8. Check the source and explain the reason for the mistake.
  9. The new copy can have different permissions.
  10. The NotebookLM help address redirected to a page titled Gemini Notebook.

In short

Use a notebook to organize evidence and practice recall. Keep sources, generated explanations and your own understanding separate.

Continue the Understand AI course →

Sources & review notes

  1. Google Help: Create a notebook in Gemini Notebook (NotebookLM help redirect)

Product information was checked on 2026-09-19. This is a selected beginner guide, not an exhaustive archive of every announcement. Recheck access, pricing and compatibility before publication. Supplied screenshots remain unreplicated claims.